{"ID":63890,"name":"Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi Guahan","href":"https:\/\/api.oyez.org\/cases\/2026\/25-579","view_count":0,"docket_number":"25-579","additional_docket_numbers":null,"manner_of_jurisdiction":"Writ of \u003Ci\u003Ecertiorari\u003C\/i\u003E","first_party":"Department of the Air Force","second_party":"Prutehi Guahan","timeline":[{"event":"Granted","dates":[1774760400],"href":"https:\/\/api.oyez.org\/case_timeline\/case_timeline\/55808"}],"lower_court":{"ID":5,"name":"United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit","href":"https:\/\/api.oyez.org\/taxonomy\/term\/5"},"facts_of_the_case":"\u003Cp\u003EThe U.S. Air Force operates Andersen Air Force Base at the northern tip of Guam, adjacent to Tarague Beach\u2014a coastal area that sits above Guam\u0027s sole-source drinking-water aquifer and serves as habitat for endangered sea turtles. Since 1982, the Air Force has disposed of hazardous waste munitions at Tarague Beach through open burning and open detonation (OB\/OD) operations, a method that involves igniting or exploding ordnance in open air. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the Air Force must obtain a permit every three years from the Guam Environmental Protection Agency (Guam EPA), which has administered RCRA on the island since 1986. The Air Force has renewed that permit on a triennial cycle without interruption.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWhen its most recent permit approached expiration in September 2021, the Air Force submitted a renewal application to Guam EPA in May 2021\u2014without first preparing any environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The application described planned OB\/OD operations for 2021 through 2024 and proposed restarting open burning, which had been inactive since at least the early 2000s. The Air Force conducted no environmental impact statement, no environmental assessment, and offered no public comment opportunity before committing to that plan. Guam EPA accepted the application, held a public comment period, and issued a preliminary notice neither approving nor denying the application while it reviewed public comments. Meanwhile, under RCRA\u0027s automatic-extension provision, the Air Force continued OB\/OD operations under its 2018 permit while the renewal remained pending.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EPrutehi Litekyan filed suit in the District Court of Guam in January 2022, alleging that the Air Force violated NEPA by submitting its RCRA permit renewal application without conducting the required environmental review; the district court granted the Air Force\u0027s motion to dismiss on three grounds\u2014lack of standing, absence of final agency action, and failure to state a claim\u2014and Prutehi Litekyan timely appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which reversed all three holdings.\u003C\/p\u003E\n","question":"\u003Cp\u003E1. When the federal government submits a permit application to continue disposing of hazardous waste, does that submission count as a final, reviewable government decision under federal law?\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E2. Before submitting that permit application, must the federal government first conduct the broad environmental review that federal law generally requires\u2014even though the hazardous waste permitting process already includes its own, more limited environmental review?\u003C\/p\u003E\n","conclusion":null,"advocates":null,"oral_argument_audio":null,"citation":{"volume":null,"page":null,"year":null,"href":"https:\/\/api.oyez.org\/case_citation\/case_citation\/28146"},"decisions":null,"first_party_label":"Petitioner","second_party_label":"Respondent","heard_by":[null],"decided_by":null,"term":"2026","location":null,"opinion_announcement":null,"description":"A case in which the Court will decide (1) when the federal government submits a permit application to continue disposing of hazardous waste, whether that submission count as a final, reviewable government decision under federal law; and (2) before submitting that permit application, whether the federal government must first conduct the broad environmental review that federal law generally requires\u2014even though the hazardous waste permitting process already includes its own, more limited environmental review.","written_opinion":null,"related_cases":null,"justia_url":"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/2026\/25-579\/","argument2_url":null}